I might still subscribe to the Newspaper if…


Newspaper BoatSome of you that know my background understand that I worked in the Newspaper Industry for over a decade. Some of my greatest accomplishments were in the industry, both professionally and technically. It truly saddens me that newspapers are fading… but I don't think it's a death, it's really a suicide.

Newspapers watched as classifieds walked to eBay and Craigslist. Arrogantly, they didn't think to take some of their profits and invest in online auctions or classifieds. The amazing thing about this is that they held the ultimate card – geography. Had newspapers found a way to tap online classifieds into a regional solution, I think they could have held out. It's too late now… every successful online classified system has a regional component to it.

So how might I still subscribe to a Newspaper?

If their publishers would stop pulling loads of AP crap, their Editors stopped editing, they stopped letting go of local talent, and they started to let their reporters run free. In other words – if they stopped being stupid about about enforcing ‘the bottom line' and utilized the talent they have, I would be there for them.

Proof? Just read Ruth Holloday's blog when you get the chance. I worked at the local newspaper for a few years, read the paper every day, and never really knew Ruth. But for the last year I've been reading her blog and it blows me away. Her integrity, honesty, bluntness, and absolute passion to get to the story is something I never recognized when she wrote for the Star. In fact, I didn't even know who she was at the Star!

How did they keep talent like her from exploding I have no idea… I can only guess it was politics and editing. I read the articles at IndyStar now and most of them read like police reports or obituaries… no life in them whatsoever. It drives me insane that they can't see this and do something about it.

I had a boss and mentor, Skip Warren, a long time ago. He said that employees would always surprise you if you gave them the opportunity to be successful. This is no different with newspapers. Monster corporations, politics, and middle management have destroyed the newspaper. Ruth's blog will continue to build momentum… and anyone with a news reader will find these ex-newspaper journalists and begin reading their blogs!

Ruth doesn't have an advertising budget to try to keep her on top like the Star does, but no worries – I think the Star's site will kill enough of its internal talent that will push people to more informative sites like Ruth's! I've heard from insiders that the areas of growth in the Star's site have really centered around user-generated content, niche (local) news, and blogging. Huh! Imagine that!



  1. 1

    You know Doug, I tend to forget that people still read newspapers. I know that sounds weird, but it’s been so long since I have, that my frame of reference has changed.

    When those sales people come door-to-door selling subscriptions, I know I always end up looking like they asked if I needed to buy a block of ice for my icebox or some petroleum distillate for my horseless carriage.

    A look that says “…Really… people still do that?” 🙂

  2. 2

    I know what you mean, Tony. Google Feedreader has totally replaced my newspaper subscription. I still read some magazines… perhaps where the talent has moved. And I’m a book nut. I think the smell and feel of paper is still natural to me.

    What I miss the most is the talent, though… that’s what I was really trying to say. I hope that journalists turn to blogging more and more (outside the newspapers they work for). In fact, I’d love to see ‘sponsored’ blogging sites with real journalists that have no boundaries for where they can take their writing.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.