We love infographics… and if you haven’t noticed, we now have a category just for the Infographics (along with its own feed). We love infographics so much that we’ve started to develop our own as well as some for our partners and clients. This one was developed for our client, Webtrends, and provides a history of social media analytics and web analytics.
If you’d like to share this Infographic on your site, you have our full permission as long as you provide a link back to this post and to Webtrends. This infographic was developed by our agency, DK New Media.
That is typical for infographics that supply statistics. However, this isn’t polled or calculated data that requires verification. The list of resources would have been longer than the Infographic itself. If you read each item, you’ll find that we refer to the source where necessary (Wikipedia, Gartner, Company name, etc.). Check the company websites’ histories as well.
That is typical for infographics that supply statistics. However, this isn’t polled or calculated data that requires verification. The list of resources would have been longer than the Infographic itself. If you read each item, you’ll find that we refer to the source where necessary (Wikipedia, Gartner, Company name, etc.). Check the company websites’ histories as well.
Cool, but I wouldn’t put the Java logo for Javascript 😉
Great catch, Marco! Netscape logo forthcoming 🙂
Could you list your sources? That should be standard practice when creating an infographic.
Hi Joey,
That is typical for infographics that supply statistics. However, this isn’t polled or calculated data that requires verification. The list of resources would have been longer than the Infographic itself. If you read each item, you’ll find that we refer to the source where necessary (Wikipedia, Gartner, Company name, etc.). Check the company websites’ histories as well.
Doug
Hi Joey,
That is typical for infographics that supply statistics. However, this isn’t polled or calculated data that requires verification. The list of resources would have been longer than the Infographic itself. If you read each item, you’ll find that we refer to the source where necessary (Wikipedia, Gartner, Company name, etc.). Check the company websites’ histories as well.
Doug
Just a little correction just FYI, XiTi (now AT Internet) started in 1997, not 2004
Just a little correction just FYI, XiTi (now AT Internet) started in 1997, not 2004
Hi Antoine,
The focus wasn’t on the launch of the company but on the analytics platform that was released.
Doug