Will We Ever Return to Building Our Own Computers? Framework Gives Me Hope

I began my digital career by connecting PCs to PLCs and networking the devices to retrieve performance data for preventive maintenance routines. Back then, building a PC was part art, part obsession, part continual discovery. You’d choose your case, pick a motherboard you liked, slot in the memory, add your video card, connect the storage, tweak the cooling, and iterate. As new components hit the market, you swapped in what you needed, year after year. It felt like these machines were alive—you could nurture them, extend their life, customize them to your needs.

That mindset is largely gone. Companies favor sealed units. Most modern laptops are glued or soldered together, with little room for upgrades or repairs. Apple’s design direction, once a champion of elegant engineering, has shifted over time toward monolithic, closed systems. Your MacBook Air—or any modern Mac—offers performance and polish, but disassembly is discouraged (and often practically impossible without damaging parts). You can’t upgrade RAM, storage, or even the battery in many models without specialized tools or a complete replacement.

This design philosophy treats electronics as disposable. It directs you toward trade-ins and new purchases rather than repairs or incremental upgrades. The shorter the lifecycle, the more frequently you’re nudged into buying again. That’s not just frustrating for enthusiasts—it also has environmental costs.

As components scale down and integration increases, the excuse that modularity is impractical is less convincing. If done well, modular design needn’t be clunky or inefficient. It can actually deliver more longevity, less waste, and deeper user engagement.

Framework: A Live Case Study in Modularity

Framework is the one company I’ve found that unapologetically embraces modularity, repairability, and longevity in a laptop form factor. Their design philosophy is to make as many parts replaceable—by the user, with standard connectors, screws, and open documentation—rather than soldered or glued.

Here’s how their current lineup reflects that philosophy (as of October 2025):

Core Modular Features Across Framework Laptops

Because of this architecture, you’re not forced to toss the whole machine when one part becomes obsolete or fails. You can, in many cases, replace or upgrade only that component.

The Current Model Lineup (2025 Snapshot)

To bring this to life, here’s a look at the main Framework products and how they reflect the modular ethos.

I’m Not Ready to Give Up on Apple Yet

The ethos behind Framework resonates deeply with what I loved about building PCs. It’s not just about swapping parts—it’s about agency, control, longevity, and sustainability. It flips the narrative of electronics from a disposable commodity to an evolving platform.

If mainstream players, including Apple, embraced more modularity, the industry would shift. Instead of silos and forced obsolescence, we could see a future where your computer is an ecosystem you upgrade over time, patching and expanding rather than replacing.

That said, I’m not ready to abandon Apple just yet. Their integration, ecosystem coherence, and hardware-software polish remain unmatched. Their performance and design continue to push boundaries. But I hope they evolve away from the trade-in or toss model and explore a more modular, repairable future.

In the meantime, Framework offers a hopeful countercurrent—a sign that modular, upgradeable electronics aren’t a relic of the past but a possible path forward. I may still use Apple gear, but I carry in me the hope that one day even they will embrace a future where we don’t throw away devices—we evolve them.

Exit mobile version