Web2App
Web2App is the acronym for Website to Application.

Website to Application
Refers to the process of converting an existing website into a mobile application that can be published in the Apple App Store and Google Play. Instead of developing a mobile app from scratch, Web2App solutions package a website inside a native shell, allowing it to function as an app while still relying on the website’s content and logic. This approach enables organizations to enter the mobile app marketplace quickly and at a lower cost than full native development.
How Web2App Works
A Web2App solution typically uses a WebView component, which is a browser engine embedded inside a native application. The WebView displays the website, while the native shell provides additional functionality. Depending on the platform, developers can extend the app with features such as push notifications, access to device hardware like the camera or GPS, offline caching for faster performance, or native navigation menus. Some solutions display the website as it is, while others allow a deeper mix of web and native functionality.
Benefits of Web2App
Organizations often choose Web2App for the balance it provides between efficiency and functionality. The main benefits include:
- Faster time to market, since the app uses existing web content
- Lower costs compared to developing separate native applications for iOS and Android
- Unified content management, because updates made to the website appear in the app automatically
- Visibility in app stores, which extends brand reach beyond search engines
- Improved engagement through push notifications and integration with device features
Web2App Limitations and Considerations
Web2App has limitations when compared to full native or hybrid development. Performance may not match that of a native app, especially for graphics-heavy or real-time applications. The user experience (UX) largely depends on how well the original website is optimized for mobile devices. App store policies may also present challenges, as Apple and Google sometimes reject apps that are little more than websites wrapped in an app. Businesses that require complex offline features or deep hardware integration may need to consider other approaches.
Comparisons to Other Approaches
It is useful to compare Web2App with other mobile development strategies:
- Native applications are built specifically for iOS or Android using their official programming languages. They offer the best performance and full access to device features, but require separate development efforts and higher budgets.
- Hybrid applications combine web technologies with a native shell, using frameworks such as Ionic or Cordova. These provide more integration with device APIs than simple Web2App wrappers, but still reuse a large amount of web code.
- Progressive Web Applications (PWAs) are websites that behave like apps in a browser. They can work offline, send push notifications, and be installed on a user’s home screen. However, they do not rely on app stores, which may reduce discoverability.
- Web2App solutions sit between PWAs and hybrid applications. They enable businesses to repurpose a website for app distribution while incorporating some native features, albeit not to the same extent as hybrid or fully native approaches.
Common Web2App Use Cases
Web2App is often the right choice for organizations that already have a responsive website and want to extend their reach to app stores without having to start from scratch. Common examples include:
- E-commerce stores that want to drive mobile sales with shopping apps and push reminders
- Media publishers that distribute articles, podcasts, or videos through mobile apps
- Membership communities that provide exclusive or gated content in a branded app
- Event organizers that offer schedules, maps, and updates in an app format
Web2App is a practical solution for organizations that want to move into the mobile app space without the time and expense of full native development. It provides a bridge between the web and mobile ecosystems, making it easier to distribute content and services through app stores. Although it cannot match the performance or flexibility of native or hybrid approaches, it is well-suited to content-driven, transactional, or community-focused websites where cost efficiency, speed, and brand consistency are priorities.