It’s Time to Steer Clear of Social Media Algorithms and Market Happiness
Brands compete not only for attention but also for trust, loyalty, and emotional resonance. But what if much of the attention flowing through social media is being drawn toward the angriest, most divisive, and least uplifting corners of the internet? What if that attention is undermining your customers’ well-being, and by extension, your long-term brand value?
Before we dive into how businesses can play a more constructive role, let’s look at the darker side of social media: the data, the mechanisms, and the incentives.
Table of Contents
Engagement: Attention at the Expense of Happiness
Social media platforms are finely tuned to prioritize content that maximizes attention. Unfortunately, human psychology and algorithmic incentives can conspire to surface the worst offenders, such as outrage, conflict, and toxicity.
Algorithms Amplify Division
In an audit of X’s algorithm, researchers showed that the engagement-based ranking system amplifies emotionally charged, hostile, out-group content far more than a simple chronological or user-stated-preference baseline. In that study, the algorithmically selected posts made users feel worse about opposing political groups, even though users did not prefer those posts when asked directly.
This means that what the algorithm thinks you’ll click isn’t always what you say you want to see, and it often prioritizes what makes you angrier. The researchers proposed that blending “stated preferences” (what users say they like) with engagement signals might reduce divisiveness, but this is still early work.
Toxicity Drives Clicks
A large field experiment across Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube deliberately hid toxic content for randomized users over six weeks. The result: engagement dropped. Time spent fell by about nine percent on Facebook, content consumption decreased by twenty-three percent, and ad impressions declined significantly. The study also observed that users exposed to less toxicity created less toxic content themselves, creating a kind of virtuous contagion.
In a follow-up survey, the authors demonstrated that toxicity stokes curiosity. When users encountered posts flagged as toxic, they were about eighteen percent more likely to click into comment threads, even when it didn’t yield them more satisfaction. Negativity gets clicks, even if it makes people feel worse.
Division Outpaces Positivity
Another study focused on political content showed that out-group language, meaning naming or criticizing an opposing political side, was the single strongest predictor of shareability, far stronger than mere negativity or moral-emotional phrasing. In one dataset, using out-group language increased the odds of being shared by sixty-seven percent.
Together, these findings sketch a clear picture: social media’s engagement machinery tends to elevate content that is polarizing, negative, or toxic because it works in terms of metrics. But it doesn’t necessarily feel good for users.
Why This Happens: Incentives, Bias, and Design
If we step back, the dynamics behind these outcomes are not mysterious. They reflect the intersection of human attention biases and algorithmic incentives.
- Negativity bias and emotional arousal. Negative stimuli grab more attention than neutral or mildly positive ones. Anger, fear, and outrage produce emotional arousal, pulling us in and making us linger, comment, or share more. Algorithms optimized for dwell time or click-throughs naturally amplify these stimuli.
- Engagement over welfare. Platforms are optimized for engagement metrics such as time on site, clicks, and shares. The business model rewards scenarios where users are “sticky,” even if their emotional state worsens. Welfare is rarely built into these objectives.
- Feedback loops and contagion. When users encounter toxic or divisive content, they may respond with anger, harsh comments, or counterarguments, which adds more content for the algorithm to surface. Negativity begets more negativity, which begets more engagement. The toxicity experiment showed that filtering out negative content not only reduced exposure but also reduced users’ own propensity to post negativity.
- Platform trade-offs and exit risk. When users’ feeds were cleaned up, some migrated to other, less-moderated platforms. That means a platform that suppresses toxicity too aggressively may lose users to the chaos of the open web.
The bottom line is that platforms face a trade-off. Curbing toxicity often reduces engagement and ad revenue in the short term. Ignoring it erodes user well-being, trust, and long-term value.
Pause and Reflect: Is This the Mindset You Want for Your Customers?
This is the crucible question for any brand or marketing leader:
Do you want your brand to attract people in their angriest, most cynical, stress-driven state?
If your customer journey begins in the trenches of outrage and division, then your relationship is inherently transactional, defensive, and reactive. That kind of start sets you up for churn, distrust, and superficial loyalty at best.
By contrast, imagine if your brand could be associated with serenity, inspiration, learning, and connection. A customer base cultivated from calm curiosity and genuine respect is more likely to stick, advocate, and convert in ways that scale sustainably.
As a martech leader, you influence the signals your brand amplifies, the tone you adopt, and the direction you encourage people to take. You can choose to design experiences that interrupt the negative spiral rather than contribute to it.
It’s Time to Market Happiness: How Brands Can Lead
If we accept that social media’s default machinery tends to be dark, then brands that adopt a different orientation gain not just moral high ground but a competitive advantage. Here’s how to bake positivity, intentionality, and longevity into your marketing tech and strategy.
- Create positivity-dominant channels: Don’t rely entirely on social media to engage your audience. Invest in community platforms you control, such as forums, private groups, or branded apps, where you can moderate tone, nurture positivity, and emphasize value over virality. Cultivate spaces where people can ask questions, share wins, and build trust without competing for clicks.
- Design for emotional safety: In your digital experiences, include friction and guardrails to discourage negativity. Introduce comment moderation or pre-approval for user-generated content, offer generous reaction choices, such as support or celebrate, and use prompts like Would this post be helpful to others? before publishing. Research shows that friction-based interventions can slow down impulsive sharing and improve the quality of discourse.
- Use content as a vector for well-being: Build your content strategy around uplift, support, and curiosity. Share microlearning tips people can act on today, highlight customer stories of growth and resilience, host live events that foster human connection, and introduce wellness nudges such as reflective emails or chatbot check-ins. Content that inspires, educates, or comforts creates emotional equity far deeper than outrage-driven engagement.
- Align analytics with well-being metrics: Move beyond surface-level engagement data like clicks or time-on-page and track emotional impact and satisfaction. Measure feedback on how content makes users feel, observe sustained engagement ratios over time, and analyze sentiment before and after exposure. If a campaign consistently provokes anger or fatigue, it’s a warning sign even if performance metrics look strong.
- Organize happiness-focused experiences: Bring your digital audience into real-world or hybrid environments that foster connection and joy. Host community meetups focused on learning and creativity, organize unconference-style sessions where participants co-create positive outcomes, and include well-being elements at events, such as digital detox zones or volunteer opportunities. Human-centered events translate positivity into tangible brand loyalty.
- Establish positive norms and moderation early: Every digital space needs clearly defined standards of respect and kindness. Set community rules that encourage civility, empower moderators to model good behavior, reward helpful contributors, and maintain transparency in responding to toxic content. The less exposure people have to negativity, the less likely they are to reproduce it themselves.
Calm the Signal, Elevate the Signal
Our social media platforms optimize for engagement, which often arises from strife, conflict, and outrage. But brands do not have to mirror that direction.
As marketers and technologists, we can choose to design for the long game: market happiness, not virality by outrage. We can build spaces, campaigns, and experiences that lean into joy, curiosity, and human connection. These are the traits that build lasting relationships.
So ask yourself: is your customer journey beginning in the trenches of negativity, or is it starting in the light? It’s time to market something different: happiness.
Related Martech Zone Content
